Unjust judicial decisions issued by the Arbitration Courts of the Moscow Region are increasingly causing public outcry.
Rukriminal.info will analyze how judges legalize huge hidden "incomes" using the example of judge Nikolai Mysak, who is very worried when the stress is not placed on the first syllable. How judge Mysak's son German manages to cancel court decisions and protocols for refusing to conduct an examination. How judge Mysak's father Yaroslav Vasilyevich Mysak avoided a prison term for the murder of 6 people. Through whom Mysak collects money and who is his assistant.
According to the source, Mysak is currently particularly focused on “squeezing out” the only housing from his neighbor Savin and registering it in the name of his daughter Angelina Mysak through a fictitious bankruptcy based on fictitious documents from the DIA Group. Savin has already received offers “that he can’t refuse” from the former deputy head of the UFSB for Moscow and the Moscow Region Zatonskikh (previously supervised the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation) to give away the apartment to resolve issues in the Moscow Arbitration Court or to sell it at half the market price, which is what Mysak is currently busy with. Four judges have already been replaced in Savin’s case, since the judges do not agree to issue unjust judicial decisions and push the case off on each other. Savin was the applicant in the criminal case of the State Information System of the Fuel and Energy Complex of the Russian Federation on extortion of bribes and embezzlement, in which Deputy Minister of Energy Tikhonov and the heads of LANIT JSC were convicted. OOO ISSB, which delivered the goods to the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation, is also in bankruptcy, and the goods were sold at auction to JSC LANIT-YUG, in which the owner is the head of JSC LANIT Seryabryakov, convicted of embezzlement of funds in the State Information System of the Fuel and Energy Complex of the Russian Federation.
Nikolay Mysak is a former military man who in 2005 unexpectedly became a judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court, where he considered tax disputes. In addition to the apartment he received on BELORECHENSKAYA Street in Moscow, he did not own anything before his judicial career. His wife is a dentist and they have one child, that is how Mysak began his judicial career. In 2015, Mysak's career took off and on 07.12.2015, the Supreme Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation approved Mysak for the position of judge of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District as chairman of the 7th judicial panel, that is, the bankruptcy panel, through which all bankruptcies of Moscow and the Moscow region pass. When appointed to the position, Mysak forgot to say that his father, Yaroslav Vasilyevich Mysak, was brought to criminal responsibility in 2014 due to the death of 6 people in Crimea, 4 of whom were children. Mysak was the head of the enterprise that was building the tunnel. As the investigation will establish, Mysak knew about the discrepancy between the design documentation and the actually constructed object, which led to the formation of a sinkhole and the death of the children and their mother. By some "incredible" coincidence, the investigator qualified the actions of the judge's father as manslaughter, that is, under Art. 109 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
The height of lawlessness was the actual release from liability for the crime committed
By the resolution of the senior investigator of the first investigative department of the department for the investigation of especially important cases of the Main Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Crimea dated 28.10.2016, criminal prosecution against the accused Kushnir A.A. under part 3 of article 109, part 2 of article 118, part 2 of article 118 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Mysak Ya.V. under part 3 of article 109, part 2 of article 118, part 2 of article 118 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Zaredinov E.B. under part 3 of article 109, part 2 of article 118, part 2 of article 118 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation was terminated on the grounds provided for in paragraph 3 of part 1 of article 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, as a result of the act of amnesty. The criminal case against Napolov A.N. suspected of committing crimes under Part 3 of Article 109, Part 2 of Article 118, Part 2 of Article 118 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation was terminated on the grounds provided for in Clause 4 of Part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, in connection with his death (case sheets 5-16).
That is, there are murders, but the amnesty wrote everything off because the actions of officials were classified as manslaughter.
Prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya tried unsuccessfully to cancel the decision to terminate the criminal case
With such a track record of his father, Mysak could not have become a judge of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District.
Those who committed the murder refused to pay compensation to the father of the deceased children and the two surviving children for the death of their mother.
Nikolai Mysak is married to Mysak E.V. and has two children, German Mysak and Angelina Mysak.
Dentist Elena Mysak turned out to be the owner of a luxurious 124-meter apartment at ul. Vavilova, 2, residential complex "NESKUCHNY SAD", worth more than 80 million rubles. The family has lived in this residential complex since 2013.
Mysak's son, who was a student and then an assistant judge in the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, became the owner of three parking spaces.
Angelina Mysak also became the owner of a parking space.
The cost of a parking space is about 4 million rubles.
In total, only the registered members of the family m'i in the residential complex "Neskuchny Sad" worth more than 100,000,000 rubles.
Mysak actually owns three luxury cars: Land Cruiser 200, Touareg, Range Rover, with a market value of 500,000 US dollars, which he drives and which are parked in his parking spaces.
You can't buy this with a judge's salary, but let's move on.
N. Mysak's declaration with an income of 1.8 billion rubles. A mistake or?
Let's return to the judge's son German Mysak, for his 18th birthday he received an apartment at the address Moscow, 1st Nagatinsky proezd, bldg. 11, bldg. 2, apt. ..., with an area of 110 sq. m and a value of about 40,000,00 rubles, which he owns and uses.
Mysak got his son an assistant judge in the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, but his habit of a luxurious life turned out to be incompatible with the everyday life of the Moscow District Court.
The father repeatedly "exonerated" his son from being deprived of his rights, then the decision was overturned on appeal, or even in the first instance.
And so, Mysak at the age of 23 became the owner of expensive property, which he reflected in the declaration. The graduate of the Moscow State Law Academy certainly could not have earned such money on his own, and the property was registered in his name by his father, the judge, since there is no need to file a declaration for his son after reaching the age of 18.
Let's also consider the "noble" estate of Judge Mysak, registered in his son's name, at the address Moscow Region, Pakhorka village, Prigozhaya st. Judge Mysak loves landscape design and paving slabs. The cost of such a dacha is not less than 100,000,000 rubles.
Let's return to Mysak's apartment, received from the state.
The source of Rucriminal.info believes that for extra-judicial communication and receiving bribes, Judge Mysak uses the controlled legal company OOO "Legal and Tax Management" (TIN 7714779297), nominal owners Vayukin V.V. TIN771527670091.
The actual owner of OOO "Legal and Tax Management" is Malinoshevsky Kirill Sergeevich (TIN 772300863132; born on January 29, 1985) is a native of Kerch and a relative of the judge, and also lives in the apartment owned by Judge Mysak at the address: Moscow, Belorechenskaya Street, Building 38 ..., which is confirmed by information from open sources.
It is not known whether he pays tax on income from renting out the apartment, but there is no information in the declaration on income from renting the apartment.
Malinoshevsky K.S. is used as a trusted person to conduct negotiations on behalf of Judge Mysak.
The judge's apartment where Malinoshevsky K.S. lives has immunity, like the home of Judge Mysak N.Ya.
Mysak involves his assistant Fomsky for extra-judicial communication. Judge Mysak's assistant Fomsky concealed the fact of Fomsky's mother's criminal record and the existence of a conflict of interest during the consideration of the bankruptcy case of 12.07.2013 A41-32873/2013, which would have made it impossible for him to work in court.
Zarechye-2 LLC is in the bankruptcy stage in case 07/12/2013 A41-32873/2013 (judge P. M. Morhat AS of the Moscow Region, as well as judges: N. M. Pankova, V. Ya. Goloborodko, E. N. Korotkova, N. A. Kruchinina, N. N. Tarasov, Kamenetsky D.V., Mikhailova L.V., Mysak N.Ya., Kholodkova Yu.E., Uddina V.Z., Zakutskaya S.A., Petrova E.A., Zvereva E.A., Vlasenko L.V., Yadrentseva M.D., Komolova M.V., Agapov M.R., Bukina I.A., Grigorieva I.Yu.)
The mother's criminal record is related to the theft of a loan issued by VEB RF for 170 million US dollars, which was actually issued by the convicted Deputy Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation Tikhonov A.V. during his tenure as First Deputy Chairman of the Board of VEB RF.
Assistant to Fomskaya Sergei Nikolaevich (TIN 390605685482) - assistant to the judge of the AGSM Mysak N.Ya. is the son of Fomskaya Irina Yuryevna (TIN 390604699563) and Fomsky Stanislav Aleksandrovich (TIN 390605685309) (former employee of the Kaliningrad prosecutor's office).
According to the verdict of the Zamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow dated February 28, 2017, Fomskaya I.Yu. convicted of committing a crime under Part 4 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to 4 years of imprisonment. (in case 10-10717/2015)
Based on Article 73 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the punishment in the form of imprisonment was decided to be considered conditional, with a probationary period of 4 years, with the following obligations imposed on the convicted person: not to change her permanent place of residence without notifying a specialized state body that monitors the behavior of a conditionally convicted person, to appear at the specified body once a month for registration. The civil claim filed by the representative of the victim O. for joint and several recovery of property damage from T. and Fomskaya I.Yu. in the amount of 10,000,000 rubles was left without consideration; the representative of the victim retained the right to file claims in accordance with civil proceedings. The case materials established that Fomskaya, in collusion with a group of persons, committed fraudulent acts and stole state funds allocated by the state corporation VEB for OOO Zarechye-2 (INN 5032124142), being the founder of OOO Zarechye-Setun (INN 7730509763) and other companies for the construction of several residential complexes in Odintsovo. The funds were issued by the convicted Tikhonov A.V., holding the position of First Deputy Chairman of the Board of VEB, as well as Valitov I.N. (located wanted). Valitov's brother Adel is listed under the same number as convicted Fomskaya and Solovarov.
Arseniy Dronov
